000			02617nam a2200229 4500
003			H12O
005			20180417112750.0
008			130622s2012 xxx||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aspa
100			_9656 _aJiménez Arriero, Miguel Ángel _ePsiquiatría
245	0	0	_aProtocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio: fiabilidad interexaminadores. _h[artículo]
260			_bRevista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, _c2012
300			_a5(1):24-36.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: García-Nieto R, Parra Uribe I, Palao D, López-Castromán J, Sáiz PA, García-Portilla MP, et al. Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio: fiabilidad interexaminadores. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2012 Jan-Mar;5(1):24-36.
501			_aPMID: 22854501
504			_aContiene 28 referencias
520			_aINTRODUCTION: Inter-rater agreement is a crucial aspect in the planning and performance of a clinical trial in which the main assessment tool is the clinical interview. The main objectives of this study are to study the inter-rater agreement of a tool for the assessment of suicidal behavior (Brief Suicide Questionnaire) and to examine whether the inter-examiner agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject is an efficient method to assess the reliability of an instrument. METHOD: In the context of designing a multicenter clinical trial, 32 psychiatrists assessed a videotaped clinical interview of a patient with suicidal behavior. In order to identify those items in which a greater level of discordance existed and detect the examiners whose ratings differed significantly from the average ratings, we used the DOMENIC method (Detecion of Multiple Examiners Not in Consensus). RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement was between poor (<70%) to excelent (90-100%. Inter-rater agreement in Brugha's list of threatening experiences ranged from 75.5 and 100%; in the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale was 82.58%; in the Beck's Suicidal Intent Scale, ranged from 67.5 and 97%; in the Beck's Scale for Suicide Ideation, ranged from 63.5 and 100%; and in the Lethality Rating Scale was 88.39%. On the whole, the level of agreement among raters, both in general scores and in particular items, was appropriate. CONCLUSION: The proposed design allows the assessment of the inter-rater agreement in an efficient way (only in one session). In addition, regarding the Brief Suicide Questionnaire, inter-raters agreement was appropriate.
710			_9150 _aServicio de Psiquiatría
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/9/pc968.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_n0 _2ddc _cART
999			_c968 _d968