000			03054na a2200241 4500
003			H12O
005			20210625062808.0
008			130622s2012 xxx||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_aGómez de la Cámara, Agustín _91011 _eEpidemiología Clínica
100			_9821 _aLora Pablos, David _eInstituto Investigación I+12
245	0	0	_aCan an intervention on clinical inertia have an impact on the perception of pain, functionality and quality of life in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis? Results from a cluster randomised trial. _h[artículo]
260			_bAtención Primaria, _c2012
300			_a44(2):65-72.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Tejedor Varillas A, León Vázquez F, Lora Pablos D, Pérez Martín A, Vargas Negrín F, Gómez de la Cámara A, et al. Can an intervention on clinical inertia have an impact on the perception of pain, functionality and quality of life in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis? Results from a cluster randomised trial. Aten Primaria. 2012 Feb;44(2):65-72.
501			_aPMID: 21645945
504			_aContiene 19 referencias
520			_aOBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether an intervention applied to general practitioners to prevent clinical inertia had an impact on pain, functionality, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: This was a cluster-based, multicentre, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study. Clusters of physicians working were assigned to one of two study groups. Physicians in Group 1 received a training session while those in Group 2 did not. SETTING: Primary Care Health centers representative of the entire Spanish territory. PARTICIPANTS: 329 general practitioners of primary healthcare centre. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention consists of a motivational session to propose a proactive care, based on current recommendations. MEASUREMENTS: Visual analogue scale (VAS); functionality (WOMAC scale) and global perception of health by SF-12. Effects were measured in two visits six months apart. RESULTS: A total of 1361 physicians, and 4076 patients participated in the study. No significant differences were observed in the clinical benefit obtained between patients assigned to Group 1 and Group 2. Nevertheless, a significant improvement was observed in the combined population (Groups 1 + 2) in the VAS (p<0.001), WOMAC (p<0.0001) and SF-12v2 (p<0.001) questionnaires in Visit 2 compared to Visit 1. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that, although this specific intervention carried out on physicians did not provide an additional clinical benefit to patients with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, an increased awareness of the patient's disease through the use of functionality indexes, as well as the mere fact of being observed, seem to improve patient-reported pain, functionality and HRQoL.
710			_9625 _aInstituto de Investigación imas12
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/8/pc8336.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_n0 _2ddc _cART
999			_c8336 _d8336