000 02760na a2200229 4500
003 H12O
005 20180417112611.0
008 130622s2012 xxx||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _cH12O
041 _aeng
100 _9878
_aPretell Mazzini, Juan
_eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
245 0 0 _aDistal metaphyseal radius fractures in children following closed reduction and casting: can loss of reduction be predicted?.
_h[artículo]
260 _bInternational Orthopaedics,
_c2012
300 _a36(7):1435-40.
500 _aFormato Vancouver: Pretell Mazzini J, Beck N, Brewer J, Baldwin K, Sankar W, Flynn J. Distal metaphyseal radius fractures in children following closed reduction and casting: can loss of reduction be predicted? Int Orthop. 2012 Jul;36(7):1435-40.
501 _aPMID: 22307559
504 _aContiene 25 referencias
520 _aPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify factors which contribute to loss of reduction (LOR). METHODS: Outpatient records and initial, post-reduction (PR) and follow-up radiographs of patients with a distal radial metaphyseal fracture were reviewed to determine demographic factors; fracture characteristics (obliquity, comminution, intact ulna); three-point cast index (3PI); and initial, PR, and follow-up displacement (angulation and translation in the sagittal and coronal planes). Univariate and multivariate regression were used to identify significant risk factors for LOR. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included in our series (119 boys and 42 girls). Fifty-seven (35%) patients met the criteria for LOR. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patients over 14 years old were 4.8 times more likely (p=0.01) to lose reduction, and those with more than 10% PR translation in the sagittal plane were four times more likely (p=0.03) to lose reduction. In younger patients, initial coronal translation and PR sagittal translation were independent risk factors. Patients with over 10% initial translation in the coronal plane were 2.4 times more likely (p=0.01) to lose reduction, and those with over 10% PR translation in the sagittal plane were 2.7 times more likely (p=0.03) to lose reduction. Three point cast index was not found to be a significant risk factor (1.64 vs. 1.57, p=0.43). CONCLUSION: Our study, the largest dedicated series of distal radial metaphyseal fractures, indicates that loss of reduction is common. Our analysis suggests that an anatomical reduction, which minimises residual translation, is the most important variable in preventing a loss of reduction.
710 _9371
_aServicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
856 _uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/6/pc6042.pdf
_ySolicitar documento
942 _n0
_2ddc
_cART
999 _c6042
_d6042