000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c17780 _d17780
003			PC17780
005			20240102140553.0
008			231229b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_9204 _aSáez de la Fuente, Ignacio _eMedicina Intensiva
100			_93382 _aQuintana Estelles, María Delicias _eMedicina Intensiva
100			_9201 _aGarcía Gigorro, Renata _eMedicina Intensiva
100			_9244 _aTerceros Almanza, Luis Juan _eMedicina Intensiva
100			_91602 _aSánchez-Izquierdo Riera, José Ángel _eMedicina Intensiva
100			_9874 _aMontejo González, Juan Carlos _eMedicina Intensiva
245	0	0	_aEnteral Nutrition in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation in a Prone Position. _h[artículo]
260			_bJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, _c2016
300			_a40(2):250-5.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Sáez de la Fuente I, Sáez de la Fuente J, Quintana Estelles MD, García Gigorro R, Terceros Almanza LJ, Sánchez Izquierdo JA et al. Enteral Nutrition in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation in a Prone Position. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Feb;40(2):250-5.
501			_aPMID: 25274497
504			_aContiene 38 referencias
520			_aBackground: Patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the prone position (PP) could have an increased risk for feeding intolerance. However, the available evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited and contradictory. Objective: To examine the feasibility and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) support and its associated complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in PP. Methods: Prospective observational study including 34 mechanically ventilated intensive care patients who were turned to the prone position over a 3-year period. End points related to efficacy and safety of EN support were studied. Results: In total, more than 1200 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit over a period of 3 years. Of these, 34 received mechanical ventilation in PP. The mean days under EN were 24.7 ± 12.3. Mean days under EN in the supine position were significantly higher than in PP (21.1 vs 3.6; P < .001), but there were no significant differences in gastric residual volume adjusted per day of EN (126.6 vs 189.2; P = .054) as well as diet volume ratio (94.1% vs 92.8%; P = .21). No significant differences in high gastric residual events per day of EN (0.06 vs 0.09; P = .39), vomiting per day of EN (0.016 vs 0.03; P = .53), or diet regurgitation per day of EN (0 vs 0.04; P = .051) were found. Conclusions: EN in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia receiving mechanical ventilation in PP is feasible, safe, and not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
710			_967 _aServicio de Medicina Intensiva
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc17780.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_2ddc _cART _n0