000 nab a22 7a 4500
999 _c17658
_d17658
003 PC17658
005 20230803134900.0
008 230803b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _cH12O
041 _aeng
100 _91783
_aCruz Bértolo, Javier de la
_eEpidemiología Clínica
245 0 0 _aClassification systems of communication for use in epidemiological surveillance of children with cerebral palsy.
_h[artículo]
260 _bDevelopmental medicine and child neurology,
_c2016
300 _a58(3):285-91.
500 _aFormato Vancouver: Virella D, Pennington L, Andersen GL, Andrada Mda G, Greitane A, Himmelmann K et al; Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe Network. Classification systems of communication for use in epidemiological surveillance of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Mar;58(3):285-91.
501 _aPMID: 26272847
504 _aContiene 25 referencias
520 _aAim: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often experience communication difficulties. We aimed to identify a classification system for communication of children with CP suitable for epidemiological surveillance. Method: Systems to classify the communication of children with CP were identified. The Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), Functional Communication Classification System (FCCS), and Viking Speech Scale (VSS) were chosen for further investigation and translated. They were administered to 155 children aged 4 to 13 years with CP (across all motor severity levels) from eight European countries. Children's parents/carers, speech therapists, and other health professionals applied the systems through direct observation. Other professionals applied them from case notes only. The systems were assessed for agreement, stability, ease, and feasibility of application. Results: Test-retest stability was moderate-to-high for VSS (k=0.66-0.88), CFCS (k=uncomputed-0.91), and FCCS (k=0.52-0.91). Overall interrater agreement was fair to very good for every classification system. VSS achieved the best agreement between parents/carers and speech therapists. VSS was considered the easiest instrument to apply. Interpretation: Because of its ease of use by a range of healthcare professionals, the VSS should be considered for CP registers which intend to survey speech intelligibility. For a wider assessment of communication, the CFCS or FCC should be considered.
710 _9625
_aInstituto de Investigación imas12
856 _uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc17658.pdf
_ySolicitar documento
942 _2ddc
_cART
_n0