000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c16878 _d16878
003			PC16878
005			20220531062750.0
008			220530b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aspa
100			_93052 _aArroyo Hernández, Marta _eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
100			_92593 _aMellado Romero, María Ángela _eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
100			_93053 _aPáramo Díaz, Pablo _eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
100			_91365 _aMartín López, Carlos _eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
100			_9367 _aCano Egea, Juan Miguel _eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
100			_91363 _aVilá y Rico, Jesús _eCirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
245	0	0	_aEstudio comparativo de la reparación de la rotura de espesor completo del supraespinoso mediante técnica "hilera simple" o "suture bridge. _h[artículo]
260			_bActa ortopédica mexicana, _c2015
300			_a29(6):288-94.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Arroyo Hernández M, Mellado Romero MA, Páramo Díaz P, Martín López CM, Cano Egea JM, Vilá y Rico J. Estudio comparativo de la reparación de la rotura de espesor completo del supraespinoso mediante técnica "hilera simple" o "suture bridge. Acta Ortop Mex. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(6):288-94.
501			_aPMID: 27403515
504			_aContiene 23 referencias
520			_aPurpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze if there is any difference between the arthroscopic reparation of full-thickness supraspinatus tears with simple row technique versus suture bridge technique. Material and methods: We accomplished a retrospective study of 123 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears between January 2009 and January 2013 in our hospital. There were 60 simple row reparations, and 63 suture bridge ones. Results: The mean age in the simple row group was 62.9, and in the suture bridge group was 63.3 years old. There were more women than men in both groups (67%). All patients were studied using the Constant test. The mean Constant test in the suture bridge group was 76.7, and in the simple row group was 72.4. We have also accomplished a statistical analysis of each Constant item. Strength was higher in the suture bridge group, with a significant statistical difference (p 0.04). The range of movement was also greater in the suture bridge group, but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Suture bridge technique has better clinical results than single row reparations, but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.298).
710			_9371 _aServicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc16878.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_2ddc _cART _n0