000 nab a22 7a 4500
999 _c16809
_d16809
003 PC16809
005 20220713062807.0
008 220419b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _cH12O
041 _aeng
100 _91851
_aBergón Sendín, Elena
_eNeonatología
100 _9814
_aPérez Grande, María del Carmen
_ePediatría
100 _9821
_aLora Pablos, David
_eInstituto Investigación I+12
100 _91783
_aCruz Bértolo, Javier de la
_eEpidemiología Clínica
100 _91848
_aMoral Pumarega, María Teresa
_eNeonatología
100 _91378
_aBustos Lozano, Gerardo
_eNeonatología
100 _91008
_aPallás Alonso, Carmen Rosa
_eNeonatología
245 0 0 _aAuditing of Monitoring and Respiratory Support Equipment in a Level III-C Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
_h[artículo]
260 _bBioMed research international,
_c2015
300 _a719497
500 _aFormato Vancouver: Bergón Sendín E, Pérez Grande C, Lora Pablos D, De la Cruz Bertolo J, Moral Pumarega MT, Bustos Lozano G et al. Auditing of Monitoring and Respiratory Support Equipment in a Level III-C Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:719497.
501 _aPMID: 26558277 PMCID: PMC4628988
504 _aContiene 27 referencias
520 _aBackground: Random safety audits (RSAs) are a safety tool but have not been widely used in hospitals. Objectives: To determine the frequency of proper use of equipment safety mechanisms in relation to monitoring and mechanical ventilation by performing RSAs. The study also determined whether factors related to the patient, time period, or characteristics of the area of admission influenced how the device safety systems were used. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in a level III-C Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) during 2012. 87 days were randomly selected. Appropriate overall use was defined when all evaluated variables were correctly programmed in the audited device. Results: A total of 383 monitor and ventilator audits were performed. The Kappa coefficient of interobserver agreement was 0.93. The rate of appropriate overall use of the monitors and respiratory support equipment was 33.68%. Significant differences were found with improved usage during weekends, OR 1.85 (1.12-3.06, p = 0.01), and during the late shift (3 pm to 10 pm), OR 1.59 (1.03-2.4, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Equipment safety systems of monitors and ventilators are not properly used. To improve patient safety, we should identify which alarms are really needed and where the difficulties lie for the correct alarm programming.
710 _9625
_aInstituto de Investigación imas12
710 _9446
_aServicio de Pediatría-Neonatología
856 _uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4628988/
_yAcceso libre
942 _2ddc
_cART
_n0