000 | nab a22 7a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c16343 _d16343 |
||
003 | PC16344 | ||
005 | 20210423120722.0 | ||
008 | 210409b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _cH12O | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 |
_9876 _aAguado García, José María _eEnfermedades Infecciosas |
||
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aImportance of Aspergillus spp. isolation in Acute exacerbations of severe COPD: prevalence, factors and follow-up: the FUNGI-COPD study. _h[artículo] |
260 |
_bRespiratory research, _c2014 |
||
300 | _a15(1):17. | ||
500 | _aFormato Vancouver: Huerta A, Soler N, Esperatti M, Guerrero M, Menendez R, Gimeno A et al. Importance of Aspergillus spp. isolation in Acute exacerbations of severe COPD: prevalence, factors and follow-up: the FUNGI-COPD study. Respir Res. 2014 Feb 11;15(1):17. | ||
501 | _aPMID: 24517318 PMC3996133 | ||
504 | _aContiene 32 referencias | ||
520 | _aBackground: Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are often associated with infectious agents, some of which may be non-usual, including Aspergillus spp. However, the importance of Aspergillus spp. in the clinical management of AECOPD still remains unclear. Objectives: The aims of the study were to analyze the prevalence and risk factors associated with Aspergillus spp. isolation in AECOPD, and to investigate the associated clinical outcomes during a 1-year follow-up period. Methods: Patients presenting with an AECOPD requiring hospitalization were prospectively included from four hospitals across Spain. Clinical, radiological and microbiological data were collected at admission and during the follow-up period (1, 6 and 12 months after discharge), and re-admissions and mortality data collected during the follow-up. Results: A total of 240 patients with severe AECOPD were included. Valid sputum samples were obtained in 144 (58%) patients, and in this group, the prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation was 16.6% on admission and 14.1% at one-year follow-up. Multivariate logistic-regression showed that AECOPD in the previous year (OR 12.35; 95% CI, 1.9-29.1; p < 0.001), concurrent isolation of pathogenic bacteria (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.65-9.45, p = 0.001) and concomitant isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2.80; 95% IC, 1.81-11.42; p = 0.001) were the main risk factors for Aspergillus spp. isolation. Conclusions: The main risk factors for Aspergillus spp. isolation were AECOPD in the previous year and concomitant isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, although Aspergillus spp. is often isolated in sputum samples from patients with AECOPD, the pathogenic and clinical significance remains unclear. | ||
710 |
_9266 _aUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas |
||
856 |
_uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996133/ _yAcceso libre |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cART _n0 |