000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c16065 _d16065
003			PC16065
005			20210318142610.0
008			201013b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_91930 _aRomero Otero, Javier _eUrología
100			_92125 _aGarcía Gómez, Borja _eUrología
100			_91794 _aMedina Polo, José _eUrología
100			_92445 _aJIménez Alcaide, Estíbaliz _eUrología
100			_91692 _aRodríguez Antolín, Alfredo _eUrología
245	0	0	_aEvaluation of current errors within the administration of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors after more than 10 years of use. _h[artículo]
260			_bUrology, _c2014
300			_a83(6):1334-8.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Romero Otero J, García Gómez B, Medina Polo J, Jiménez Alcaide E, García Cruz E, Sallent Font A et al. Evaluation of current errors within the administration of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors after more than 10 years of use. Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1334-8.
501			_aPMID: 24745797
504			_aContiene 19 referencias
520			_aObjective: To detect current errors within the administration of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) and evaluate and elucidate what percentage of patients could be recovered for oral therapy with different subtypes of PDE5is through a re-education program. Methods: Two hundred fifty patients remitted to the andrology unit were prospectively analyzed. Patients' chief complaint was erectile dysfunction despite treatment with PDE5i. The International Index of Erectile Function was used to measure erectile function. A structured interview was developed to evaluate the most frequent errors within the administration of PDE5is. A re-education program was offered to patients with incomplete or incorrect use of PDE5is according to the structured interview, classifying them into true nonresponders or false nonresponders. Finally, the percentage of patients who could be recovered for oral therapy with other PDE5is was analyzed. Results: A total of 172 patients (69%) presented some error within drug administration. The most common error was not trying >1 PDE5i (41%). A re-education program was offered to these nonresponders, and 115 (66.9%) accepted. Up to 27 (23.5%) did not respond to the re-education program and were classified as true nonresponders, whereas 88 (76.5%) had a positive response to treatment and were thus included in the false nonresponder group. Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients remitted to our andrology unit and cataloged as nonresponders were in fact using PDE5i in suboptimal conditions. Offering patients more accurate information provided almost 76% with good results using PDE5is and could therefore be successfully treated with these drugs.
710			_9220 _aServicio de Urología
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc16065.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_2ddc _cART _n0