000			02904na a2200325 4500
999			_c12323 _d12323
003			PC12323
005			20180417105942.0
008			130622s2013 xxx||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_aGuerrero Ramos, Félix _92375 _eUrología
100			_aRodríguez Antolín, Alfredo _91692 _eUrología
100			_aPassas Martínez, Juan _91929 _eUrología
100			_aTejido Sánchez, Ángel _9484 _eUrología
100			_aAndrés Belmonte, Amado _91321 _eNefrología
100			_aCavero Escribano, Teresa _92384 _eNefrología
245	0	0	_aPerigraft fluid collections after kidney transplantation: Does the type of donor (uncontrolled donation after circulatory death vs. donation after brain death) have a role?. _h[artículo]
260			_bCentral European Journal of Urology, _c2017
300			_a70(4):439-444.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Guerrero-Ramos F, Cavero-Escribano T, Rodríguez-Antolín A, Andrés-Belmonte A, Passas-Martínez J, Tejido-Sánchez Á. Perigraft fluid collections after kidney transplantation: Does the type of donor (uncontrolled donation after circulatory death vs. donation after brain death) have a role? Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(4):439-444.
501			_aPMID: 29410900
504			_aContiene 24 referencias
520			_aIntroduction: Perigraft fluid collection (PFC) is a common complication after kidney transplant. Its etiology is not clear and not all the causes have been identified. The influence of the type of donor has never been evaluated. Our aim was to compare the incidence, severity and management of PFC in recipients of grafts from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death (DCD) with normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (NECMO) versus recipients of grafts from donors after brain death (DBD). Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 300 kidney transplants performed in our center between 2007 and 2012. Patients were divided in two groups: 150 recipients of Maastricht II DCD graft and 150 recipients of the DBD graft. Incidence, severity according to Clavien scale and management were analyzed in both groups, and comparison was carried out using Chi-square. Results: Of the 300 kidney recipients analyzed, 93 (31.4%) suffered PFC, showing no difference between DBD (32.0%) and DCD (30.8%) groups (p = 0.9). Complicated PFC rate (defined as a PFC generating vascular compression, fever or urinary tract obstruction) was 22.9% in the DBD group versus 22.2% in the DCD group (p = 1); most complicated PFC were due to urinary tract obstruction (81%), with no difference between the groups (p = 1). Concerning Clavien scale, 78.5% of the PFC in our series were Clavien I, 19.4% Clavien IIIa and 2.2% Clavien IIIb, with no difference between both groups (p = 1). Conclusions: PFC is a frequent complication that appears in a third of our patients, showing no difference in the incidence or severity between DBD and uncontrolled DCD graft recipients.
710			_9220 _aServicio de Urología
710			_986 _aServicio de Nefrología
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc12323.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_n0 _2ddc _cART