Biblioteca Hospital 12 de Octubre
Vista normal Vista MARC Vista ISBD

Análisis de los cambios en las prácticas de nutrición en UCI tras una intervención en el proceso. [artículo]

Por: Lázaro Martín, Noelia [Medicina Intensiva] | Catalán González, Mercedes [Medicina Intensiva] | García Fuentes, Carlos [Medicina Intensiva] | Terceros Almanza, Luis Juan [Medicina Intensiva] | Montejo González, Juan Carlos [Medicina Intensiva].
Colaborador(es): Servicio de Medicina Intensiva.
Tipo de material: materialTypeLabelArtículoEditor: Medicina intensiva / Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias, 2015Descripción: 39(9):530-6.Recursos en línea: Solicitar documento Resumen: Objectives: To analyze the nutritional management practices in Intensive Care (ICU) to detect the need for improvement actions. Re-evaluate the process after implementation of improvement actions. Design: Prospective observational study in 3 phases: 1) observation; 2) analysis, proposal development and dissemination; 3) analysis of the implementation. Setting: ICU of a hospital of high complexity. Participants: Adult ICU forecast more than 48h of artificial nutrition. Primary endpoints: Parenteral nutrition (PN), enteral nutrition (EN) (type, average effective volume, complications) and average nutritional ratio. Results: A total of 229 patients (phase 1: 110, phase 3: 119). After analyzing the initial results, were proposed: increased use and precocity of EN, increased protein intake, nutritional monitoring effectiveness and increased supplementary indication NP. The measures were broadcast at specific meetings. During phase 3 more patients received EN (55.5 vs. 78.2%, P=.001), with no significant difference in the start time (1.66 vs. 2.33 days), duration (6.82 vs. 10,12 days) or complications (37,7 vs. 47,3%).Use of hyperproteic diets was higher in phase 3 (0 vs. 13.01%, P<.05). The use of NP was similar (48.2 vs. 48,7%) with a tendency to a later onset in phase 3 (1.25±1.25 vs. 2.45±3.22 days). There were no significant differences in the average nutritional ratio (0.56±0.28 vs. 0.61±0.27, P=.56). Conclusions: The use of EN and the protein intake increased, without appreciating effects on other improvement measures. Other methods appear to be necessary for the proper implementation of improvement measures.
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento
Artículo Artículo PC16787 (Navegar estantería) Disponible

Formato Vancouver:
Lázaro Martín NI, Catalán González M, García Fuentes C, Terceros Almanza L, Montejo González JC. Análisis de los cambios en las prácticas de nutrición en UCI tras una intervención en el proceso. Med Intensiva. 2015 Dec;39(9):530-6.

PMID: 26048410

Contiene 16 referencias

Objectives: To analyze the nutritional management practices in Intensive Care (ICU) to detect the need for improvement actions. Re-evaluate the process after implementation of improvement actions.
Design: Prospective observational study in 3 phases: 1) observation; 2) analysis, proposal development and dissemination; 3) analysis of the implementation.
Setting: ICU of a hospital of high complexity.

Participants: Adult ICU forecast more than 48h of artificial nutrition.
Primary endpoints: Parenteral nutrition (PN), enteral nutrition (EN) (type, average effective volume, complications) and average nutritional ratio.
Results: A total of 229 patients (phase 1: 110, phase 3: 119). After analyzing the initial results, were proposed: increased use and precocity of EN, increased protein intake, nutritional monitoring effectiveness and increased supplementary indication NP. The measures were broadcast at specific meetings. During phase 3 more patients received EN (55.5 vs. 78.2%, P=.001), with no significant difference in the start time (1.66 vs. 2.33 days), duration (6.82 vs. 10,12 days) or complications (37,7 vs. 47,3%).Use of hyperproteic diets was higher in phase 3 (0 vs. 13.01%, P<.05). The use of NP was similar (48.2 vs. 48,7%) with a tendency to a later onset in phase 3 (1.25±1.25 vs. 2.45±3.22 days). There were no significant differences in the average nutritional ratio (0.56±0.28 vs. 0.61±0.27, P=.56).
Conclusions: The use of EN and the protein intake increased, without appreciating effects on other improvement measures. Other methods appear to be necessary for the proper implementation of improvement measures.

No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.

Ingresar a su cuenta para colocar un comentario.

Con tecnología Koha