Biblioteca Hospital 12 de Octubre
Vista normal Vista MARC Vista ISBD

Profundizando en el conocimiento sobre el manejo del dispositivo para control de la eliminación fecal en el paciente crítico. [artículo]

Por: Casas Martin, A. I [Medicina Intensiva] | Fernández Gaute, Nieves [Medicina Intensiva] | Fernandez Jimenez, A [Medicina Intensiva] | Fernandez Miralles, M. J [Medicina Intensiva] | Frade Mera, María Jesús [Medicina Intensiva] | Montejo González, Juan Carlos [Medicina Intensiva] | Montes Gil, Diego [Medicina Intensiva] | Vergara Díez, Laura [Medicina Intensiva].
Colaborador(es): Servicio de Medicina Intensiva.
Editor: Enfermeria intensiva, 2013Descripción: 24(1):23-35.Recursos en línea: Solicitar documento Resumen: OBJECTIVE: To describe the general characteristics of the patient and device use. To know retention balloon pressure (RBP) and related factors. To identify rate of leakage incidence, relocation and perineal damage due to the device (PSD) and related risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analytical observational, cross-sectional study conducted in a polyvalent ICU from June-December 2010 was performed. The sample included Flexi-Seal() carriers. Variables evaluated were patient and device use characteristics, RBP, leakage and quantity, relocation and reason, PSD, sedoanalgesia infusion, neuromuscular block, patient position, Flexi-Seal type catheter, ventilatory mode (VM), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), mean intrathoracic pressure (MITP), PEEP, Glasgow, color-aspect, fecal consistency and volume. Significance P<.05. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included, 52% male, aged 5417 with 30 insertion episodes, Flexi-Seal-Signal() 33%, 108 days permanency, main indication 33% diarrhea and injured skin," 30% device removal intolerance and/or spontaneous expulsion. Median (Me) PGR =40; RI (61-19) cmH2O. Factors associated to higher PGR: SCI absence, prone-decubitus position, leakage, relocation, conventional Flexi-Seal(), MV, lower PEEP and IMP, Color-aspect, higher MITP. Leakage, relocation and PSD incidence density 43, 30 and 2 cases/100 days of catheter, respectively. Leakage and relocation risk factors: higher PGR, Glasgow and fecal volume, lower MITP, MV, assisted-spontaneous mode OR 2.5 CI (1.6-3.8) and OR 1.7(1.1-2.7), absence SCI OR 3.3 (2.2-5.1) and OR 2.4(1.5-3.8), absence neuromuscular block OR 2.4 (1.4-3.9) and OR 1.8 (1.1-3.1), Flexi-Seal() conventional
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento
Artículo Artículo PC7271 (Navegar estantería) Disponible

Formato Vancouver:
Frade Mera MJ, Vergara Díez L, Fernández Gaute N, Casas Martín AI, Montes Gil D, Fernández Miralles MJ et al. Profundizando en el conocimiento sobre el manejo del dispositivo para control de la eliminación fecal en el paciente crítico. Enferm Intensiva. 2013 Jan-Mar;24(1):23-35.

PMID: 23347729

Contiene 84 referencias

OBJECTIVE: To describe the general characteristics of the patient and device use. To know retention balloon pressure (RBP) and related factors. To identify rate of leakage incidence, relocation and perineal damage due to the device (PSD) and related risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analytical observational, cross-sectional study conducted in a polyvalent ICU from June-December 2010 was performed. The sample included Flexi-Seal() carriers. Variables evaluated were patient and device use characteristics, RBP, leakage and quantity, relocation and reason, PSD, sedoanalgesia infusion, neuromuscular block, patient position, Flexi-Seal type catheter, ventilatory mode (VM), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), mean intrathoracic pressure (MITP), PEEP, Glasgow, color-aspect, fecal consistency and volume. Significance P<.05. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included, 52% male, aged 5417 with 30 insertion episodes, Flexi-Seal-Signal() 33%, 108 days permanency, main indication 33% diarrhea and injured skin," 30% device removal intolerance and/or spontaneous expulsion. Median (Me) PGR =40; RI (61-19) cmH2O. Factors associated to higher PGR: SCI absence, prone-decubitus position, leakage, relocation, conventional Flexi-Seal(), MV, lower PEEP and IMP, Color-aspect, higher MITP. Leakage, relocation and PSD incidence density 43, 30 and 2 cases/100 days of catheter, respectively. Leakage and relocation risk factors: higher PGR, Glasgow and fecal volume, lower MITP, MV, assisted-spontaneous mode OR 2.5 CI (1.6-3.8) and OR 1.7(1.1-2.7), absence SCI OR 3.3 (2.2-5.1) and OR 2.4(1.5-3.8), absence neuromuscular block OR 2.4 (1.4-3.9) and OR 1.8 (1.1-3.1), Flexi-Seal() conventional

No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.

Ingresar a su cuenta para colocar un comentario.

Con tecnología Koha