Formato Vancouver:
Medel Herrero A, Gómez Beneyto M, Saz Parkinson Z, Bravo Ortiz MF, Amate JM. Discordancia entre fuentes estadísticas sanitarias de ámbito nacional (EMH y EESCRI, 1990-2009). Análisis de la morbilidad psiquiátrica. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):22-30.

PMID: 24998168

Contiene 17 referencias

Introduction: Two statistical sources provide data on hospital stays and discharges for all Spanish hospitals: Hospital Morbidity Survey (acronym in Spanish: EMH) and Statistics of Health Establishments providing Inpatient Care (acronym in Spanish: EESCRI). Our aim is to contrast these two statistical sources to define their accuracy and relevance in psychiatric epidemiology studies.
Material and methodology: The analysis is based on two aspects: 1.- Compare the number of psychiatric stays and hospital discharges from 1990-2009, 2.- Analyze and compare how the average stay is provided.
Results: The differences between the two statistical sources are significant and increase over time. In 2005-2009 the EMH records 121% of hospitalizations (577,078 vs. 475,414) and 46% (14,239,527 vs. 30,821,412) of psychiatric stays, compared with EESCRI. Moreover, the average stay estimated by EESCRI shows serious methodological problems, particularly in settings of prolonged hospitalization (psychiatric hospitals); the estimations are potentially below the real value.
Conclusions: Surprisingly, the questionnaires completed by hospitals to develop the EESCRI provide data on assisted morbidity quite different from that provided by the EMH, despite both statistical sources having the same inpatient records for data processing. It is difficult to attribute these differences to sampling error, as the EMH has a very high sampling fraction, which minimizes the sampling error. Given the mismatch between sources, we recommend using the EMH, as it offers more reliable data and allows an accurate determination of the length of stays.