Biblioteca Hospital 12 de Octubre
Vista normal Vista MARC Vista ISBD

Identification of components of health complexity on internal medicine units by means of the INTERMED method. [artículo]

Por: Navío Acosta, Mercedes [Psiquiatría].
Colaborador(es): Servicio de Psiquiatría.
Tipo de material: materialTypeLabelArtículoEditor: International journal of clinical practice, 2015Descripción: 69(11):1377-86.Recursos en línea: Solicitar documento Resumen: Background: The INTERMED was developed for the early identification of biological, psychological, social and health system factors considered interacting in health complexity. This is defined as the interference with the achievement of expected or desired health and service use outcomes when patients are exposed to standard care. Objective: The aim of this study was to test the INTERMED's ability to identify 'case' and 'care' complexity, identifying patients that would especially benefit from integrated care. Methods: Observational longitudinal study of Internal medicine in patients in two National Health System hospitals in Spain using the INTERMED (patients scoring ≥ 21 were considered to be 'complex'); the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), a severity of illness assessment; and standard clinical variables. Results: Six hundred and fifteen consecutives were included, and the prevalence of health complexity was 27.6%. The greatest differences between patients with and without health complexity were observed in the non-biological domains. Eighty-five per cent of patients with health complexity had non-biological items considered to require timely (immediately or soon) assistance or intervention compared to 30% of those without, nearly a threefold difference. Complex patients had a significantly higher number of medical diagnoses (p = 0.002) and number of psychiatric referrals (p = 0.041), but there were no differences in CIRS scores or lengths of stay. Conclusion: The INTERMED has the potential to identify a considerable subset of complex internal medicine inpatients for which timely corrective action related to non-biological risk factors not typically uncovered during standard medical evaluations would be considered beneficial.
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento
Artículo Artículo PC17077 (Navegar estantería) Disponible

Formato Vancouver:
Lobo E, Ventura T, Navio M, Santabárbara J, Kathol R, Samaniego E et al. Identification of components of health complexity on internal medicine units by means of the INTERMED method. Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1377-86.

PMID: 26271926

Contiene 49 referencias

Background: The INTERMED was developed for the early identification of biological, psychological, social and health system factors considered interacting in health complexity. This is defined as the interference with the achievement of expected or desired health and service use outcomes when patients are exposed to standard care.
Objective: The aim of this study was to test the INTERMED's ability to identify 'case' and 'care' complexity, identifying patients that would especially benefit from integrated care.
Methods: Observational longitudinal study of Internal medicine in patients in two National Health System hospitals in Spain using the INTERMED (patients scoring ≥ 21 were considered to be 'complex'); the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), a severity of illness assessment; and standard clinical variables.
Results: Six hundred and fifteen consecutives were included, and the prevalence of health complexity was 27.6%. The greatest differences between patients with and without health complexity were observed in the non-biological domains. Eighty-five per cent of patients with health complexity had non-biological items considered to require timely (immediately or soon) assistance or intervention compared to 30% of those without, nearly a threefold difference. Complex patients had a significantly higher number of medical diagnoses (p = 0.002) and number of psychiatric referrals (p = 0.041), but there were no differences in CIRS scores or lengths of stay.

Conclusion: The INTERMED has the potential to identify a considerable subset of complex internal medicine inpatients for which timely corrective action related to non-biological risk factors not typically uncovered during standard medical evaluations would be considered beneficial.

No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.

Ingresar a su cuenta para colocar un comentario.

Con tecnología Koha