Biblioteca Hospital 12 de Octubre
Vista normal Vista MARC Vista ISBD

Detección de eventos adversos en pacientes adultos hospitalizados mediante el método Global TriggerTool. [artículo]

Por: Ruiz López, Pedro [Unidad de Calidad] | Gómez de la Cámara, Agustín [Epidemiología Clínica].
Colaborador(es): Unidad de Calidad Asistencial | Instituto de Investigación imas12.
Tipo de material: materialTypeLabelArtículoEditor: Revista de calidad asistencial : órgano de la Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial, 2015Descripción: 30(4):166-74.Recursos en línea: Solicitar documento Resumen: Objectives: To identify and characterize adverse events (AE) in an Internal Medicine Department of a district hospital using an extension of the Global Trigger Tool (GTT), analyzing the diagnostic validity of the tool. Methods: An observational, analytical, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted on 2013 clinical charts from an Internal Medicine Department in order to detect EA through the identification of 'triggers' (an event often related to an AE). The 'triggers' and AE were located by systematic review of clinical documentation. The AE were characterized after they were identified. Results: A total of 149 AE were detected in 291 clinical charts during 2013, of which 75.3% were detected directly by the tool, while the rest were not associated with a trigger. The percentage of charts that had at least one AE was 35.4%. The most frequent AE found was pressure ulcer (12%), followed by delirium, constipation, nosocomial respiratory infection and altered level of consciousness by drugs. Almost half (47.6%) of the AE were related to drug use, and 32.2% of all AE were considered preventable. The tool demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.3% (95%CI: 88.9-93.2) and a specificity of 32.5% (95%CI: 29.9-35.1). It had a positive predictive value of 42.5% (95%CI: 40.1-45.1) and a negative predictive value of 87.1% (95%CI: 83.8-89.9). Conclusions: The tool used in this study is valid, useful and reproducible for the detection of AE. It also serves to determine rates of injury and to observe their progression over time. A high frequency of both AE and preventable events were observed in this study.
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento
Artículo Artículo PC16920 (Navegar estantería) Disponible

Formato Vancouver:
Guzmán Ruiz O, Ruiz López P, Gómez Cámara A, Ramírez Martín M. Detección de eventos adversos en pacientes adultos hospitalizados mediante el método Global TriggerTool. Rev Calid Asist. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):166-74.

PMID: 26025386

Contiene 42 referencias

Objectives: To identify and characterize adverse events (AE) in an Internal Medicine Department of a district hospital using an extension of the Global Trigger Tool (GTT), analyzing the diagnostic validity of the tool.
Methods: An observational, analytical, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted on 2013 clinical charts from an Internal Medicine Department in order to detect EA through the identification of 'triggers' (an event often related to an AE). The 'triggers' and AE were located by systematic review of clinical documentation. The AE were characterized after they were identified.
Results: A total of 149 AE were detected in 291 clinical charts during 2013, of which 75.3% were detected directly by the tool, while the rest were not associated with a trigger. The percentage of charts that had at least one AE was 35.4%. The most frequent AE found was pressure ulcer (12%), followed by delirium, constipation, nosocomial respiratory infection and altered level of consciousness by drugs. Almost half (47.6%) of the AE were related to drug use, and 32.2% of all AE were considered preventable. The tool demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.3% (95%CI: 88.9-93.2) and a specificity of 32.5% (95%CI: 29.9-35.1). It had a positive predictive value of 42.5% (95%CI: 40.1-45.1) and a negative predictive value of 87.1% (95%CI: 83.8-89.9).
Conclusions: The tool used in this study is valid, useful and reproducible for the detection of AE. It also serves to determine rates of injury and to observe their progression over time. A high frequency of both AE and preventable events were observed in this study.

No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.

Ingresar a su cuenta para colocar un comentario.

Con tecnología Koha