Biblioteca Hospital 12 de Octubre
Vista normal Vista MARC Vista ISBD

Estudio comparativo de la reparación de la rotura de espesor completo del supraespinoso mediante técnica "hilera simple" o "suture bridge. [artículo]

Por: Arroyo Hernández, Marta [Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología] | Mellado Romero, María Ángela [Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología] | Páramo Díaz, Pablo [Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología] | Martín López, Carlos [Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología] | Cano Egea, Juan Miguel [Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología] | Vilá y Rico, Jesús [Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología].
Colaborador(es): Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.
Tipo de material: materialTypeLabelArtículoEditor: Acta ortopédica mexicana, 2015Descripción: 29(6):288-94.Recursos en línea: Solicitar documento Resumen: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze if there is any difference between the arthroscopic reparation of full-thickness supraspinatus tears with simple row technique versus suture bridge technique. Material and methods: We accomplished a retrospective study of 123 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears between January 2009 and January 2013 in our hospital. There were 60 simple row reparations, and 63 suture bridge ones. Results: The mean age in the simple row group was 62.9, and in the suture bridge group was 63.3 years old. There were more women than men in both groups (67%). All patients were studied using the Constant test. The mean Constant test in the suture bridge group was 76.7, and in the simple row group was 72.4. We have also accomplished a statistical analysis of each Constant item. Strength was higher in the suture bridge group, with a significant statistical difference (p 0.04). The range of movement was also greater in the suture bridge group, but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Suture bridge technique has better clinical results than single row reparations, but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.298).
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento
Artículo Artículo PC16878 (Navegar estantería) Disponible

Formato Vancouver:
Arroyo Hernández M, Mellado Romero MA, Páramo Díaz P, Martín López CM, Cano Egea JM, Vilá y Rico J. Estudio comparativo de la reparación de la rotura de espesor completo del supraespinoso mediante técnica "hilera simple" o "suture bridge. Acta Ortop Mex. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(6):288-94.

PMID: 27403515

Contiene 23 referencias

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze if there is any difference between the arthroscopic reparation of full-thickness supraspinatus tears with simple row technique versus suture bridge technique.
Material and methods: We accomplished a retrospective study of 123 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears between January 2009 and January 2013 in our hospital. There were 60 simple row reparations, and 63 suture bridge ones.
Results: The mean age in the simple row group was 62.9, and in the suture bridge group was 63.3 years old. There were more women than men in both groups (67%). All patients were studied using the Constant test. The mean Constant test in the suture bridge group was 76.7, and in the simple row group was 72.4. We have also accomplished a statistical analysis of each Constant item. Strength was higher in the suture bridge group, with a significant statistical difference (p 0.04). The range of movement was also greater in the suture bridge group, but was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Suture bridge technique has better clinical results than single row reparations, but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.298).

No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.

Ingresar a su cuenta para colocar un comentario.

Con tecnología Koha