Biblioteca Hospital 12 de Octubre
Barea Mendoza, Jesús Abelardo Chico Fernández, Mario Sáez de la Fuente, Ignacio Estrada Lorenzo, José Manuel Montejo González, Juan Carlos

Buffered Solutions Versus Isotonic Saline for Resuscitation in Nonsurgical Critically Ill: Protocol for Cochrane Review. [revisión] - Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016 - 123(6):1522-4.

Formato Vancouver:
Barea Mendoza JA, Antequera AM, Plana MN, Chico Fernández M, Muriel A, Sáez I et al. Buffered Solutions Versus Isotonic Saline for Resuscitation in Nonsurgical Critically Ill: Protocol for Cochrane Review. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1522-4.

PMID: 27749340

Contiene 10 referencias

Fluid resuscitation is one of the most prevalent treatment in critical care. There is not definitive evidence about the best fluid for resuscitation. The aim of this review will be to asses the efficacy and safety of buffered solution versus saline. We will perform an electronic search in Medline, Embase, and Central. Studies will be eligible if they are clinical trials who including critical ill patients. Primary outcomes are mortality and renal failure. All findings will be tabulated and synthesized. We will perform a meta-analysis according to Cochrane Review standards. We will design a summary of findings table.

Con tecnología Koha